It's long been believed that Earthlings have been visiting Mars since the 70s at the latest. There are many reasons why the powers that be would keep something like this secret, but the main one is that Americans could not take on such an endeavor alone, and therefore were required to team up with the Soviets, something the redneck American population would not be able to see beyond.
So, to the point, now that we have modern miracles such as Google Mars, these secrets are becoming harder and harder to keep. Recent discoveries on Mars' surface lend credence to theories that we humans have not just visited Mars, but have been colonizing it. If it were to be found that humans have not visited Mars, then we end up with a far more disturbing set of questions, such as: who the hell is building these outposts shown in this video?!
Paying attention to every crackpot conspiracy theory that comes down the pike may not be possible, but we can sure as hell try. You don't have to believe everything you read, but you don't have to be a dick about it either. Blog in peace.
11.5.11
More evidence there was a joint USA-USSR mission to Mars in 1972! Pshh, like you needed more evidence.
All around the interwebs the past few years there have been videos and other things leaked out which seem to suggest the rumors of a joint USA-USSR mission to Mars are true. Any logically-minded skeptic would wonder why they would keep something like this secret. There are a few different reasons.
One is that this trip would have been expensive. By the USA-USSR joining forces, costs would be cut significantly.
Another is the possibility of something going wrong. Any bad publicity surrounding a Mars voyage would put a very sour taste in the publics' mouth.
We cannot forget that this is alleged to have occurred in 1972, during the Cold War. Had the American public discovered we were doing anything whatsoever in collaboration with the Soviets, they would have been pissed.
Finally, and perhaps the most important reason to keep a mission to Mars secret, would be because they wanted to keep what they believed they were going to find on this trip a secret. What could be so important on Mars' surface to hide from the public of the Earth?
A frickin' shitload. That's what.
We can get into that more in a later post.
One is that this trip would have been expensive. By the USA-USSR joining forces, costs would be cut significantly.
Another is the possibility of something going wrong. Any bad publicity surrounding a Mars voyage would put a very sour taste in the publics' mouth.
We cannot forget that this is alleged to have occurred in 1972, during the Cold War. Had the American public discovered we were doing anything whatsoever in collaboration with the Soviets, they would have been pissed.
Finally, and perhaps the most important reason to keep a mission to Mars secret, would be because they wanted to keep what they believed they were going to find on this trip a secret. What could be so important on Mars' surface to hide from the public of the Earth?
A frickin' shitload. That's what.
We can get into that more in a later post.
3.5.11
WTC Building 7: Not hit by a plane, or hardly damaged at all, but still collapsed...?
The WTC Building 7, the one no one in the government wants people talking about, also came crashing down on 9-11-2001, but why? There was no plane that hit that building.
The official story is that spilled jet fuel from the twin towers poured into building 7, thus melting the building's infrastructure as it burned, but curious that was the same reason given for the ultimate collapse of the Twin Towers. How is it that burning jet fuel is unable to melt steel under any other condition, but with the exception of the WTC?
If jet fuel could melt steel, there would be no such thing as a jet engine, wouldn't one think?
This is just another anomaly during that fateful day, among many hundreds. What truly happened on 9-11 has yet to be released to the public, but we are going after the story here at Ant Gert, bit by gruesome bit.
Americans don't want to believe that entities inside their own government could be so evil, so greedy, so ruthless, but this is exactly how they have gotten away with it.
If we stop to look at Building 7's purpose for existence in the first place we start to understand why it would be "pulled", a demolition term for purposefully collapsing a building, according to the NYC Fire Chief at the time.
Building 7's sole purpose was to stash documents, receipts, and other financial records not just for the government we can all see and hear, but for those aspects of government we do not see and hear. These are otherwise known as Black Operations. They are real, have been since the beginning of time, and America is no exception. By destroying Building 7, all records of what was spent in order to plan the attacks of 9-11 would have been destroyed. How convenient.
If one can let his or her mind relax, and eliminate all beliefs and current understandings of how the world works, this story all starts to make sense. After all, Bush had wanted to go to war from day 1, but just needed his excuse in order to get the support of the American people. He got it, didn't he?
The official story is that spilled jet fuel from the twin towers poured into building 7, thus melting the building's infrastructure as it burned, but curious that was the same reason given for the ultimate collapse of the Twin Towers. How is it that burning jet fuel is unable to melt steel under any other condition, but with the exception of the WTC?
If jet fuel could melt steel, there would be no such thing as a jet engine, wouldn't one think?
This is just another anomaly during that fateful day, among many hundreds. What truly happened on 9-11 has yet to be released to the public, but we are going after the story here at Ant Gert, bit by gruesome bit.
Americans don't want to believe that entities inside their own government could be so evil, so greedy, so ruthless, but this is exactly how they have gotten away with it.
If we stop to look at Building 7's purpose for existence in the first place we start to understand why it would be "pulled", a demolition term for purposefully collapsing a building, according to the NYC Fire Chief at the time.
Building 7's sole purpose was to stash documents, receipts, and other financial records not just for the government we can all see and hear, but for those aspects of government we do not see and hear. These are otherwise known as Black Operations. They are real, have been since the beginning of time, and America is no exception. By destroying Building 7, all records of what was spent in order to plan the attacks of 9-11 would have been destroyed. How convenient.
If one can let his or her mind relax, and eliminate all beliefs and current understandings of how the world works, this story all starts to make sense. After all, Bush had wanted to go to war from day 1, but just needed his excuse in order to get the support of the American people. He got it, didn't he?
2.5.11
How much did Osama Bin Laden have to do with 9-11? Not much, according to the FBI.
People hate Bin Laden, and not without good reason. He's been placed at the head of a terrorist organization called "Al Qaeda" which means "the Base" in Arabic, by the media as well as the government, but why?
What is their evidence?
How, exactly, did he run things?
What is their proof he ran things?
These are all totally fair questions, and since Osama Bin Laden has been most wanted for 13 years, the FBI definitely has some solid answers to these questions, right?
Nope. In fact, the FBI has reported that, in their belief, there is little to no evidence actually connecting
Bin Laden to 9-11. This is not opinion, this is fact.
But why, then, has Bin Laden been placed on the FBI's ten most wanted list for the attacks on 9-11?
The quick answer: he hasn't. Yes, he has been on the ten most wanted list, but not for the attacks of 9-11. He's listed for the US Embassy attacks in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998.
Then how is it that Osama Bin Laden is still believed to be the mastermind behind the attacks on 9-11?
Good question.
Maybe you can tell Ant Gert.
What is their evidence?
How, exactly, did he run things?
What is their proof he ran things?
These are all totally fair questions, and since Osama Bin Laden has been most wanted for 13 years, the FBI definitely has some solid answers to these questions, right?
Nope. In fact, the FBI has reported that, in their belief, there is little to no evidence actually connecting
Bin Laden to 9-11. This is not opinion, this is fact.
But why, then, has Bin Laden been placed on the FBI's ten most wanted list for the attacks on 9-11?
The quick answer: he hasn't. Yes, he has been on the ten most wanted list, but not for the attacks of 9-11. He's listed for the US Embassy attacks in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998.
Then how is it that Osama Bin Laden is still believed to be the mastermind behind the attacks on 9-11?
Good question.
Maybe you can tell Ant Gert.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)